Wigs, robes a carryover of colonial courts

             The fact of the matter is, European colonizers intended to abuse, alter and demonise Africans’ identity and symbols by imposing white wigs so that we could look the way they wanted us to look like but not who we actually are.

            So, too, colonialists wanted—and of course, succeeded—to kill our self-assurance and amour-propre (self-respect).

        Again, although wigs have their roots in ancient Egypt, did African judiciaries choose them based on gen and understanding?

                                                                  RACISM
Whatever motif and motive behind the wigs in colonial courts, they can’t serve the same purpose in free countries such as ours—well, if, indeed, they are free and want to be free.

         Mani Cavalieri, a database analyst, said Whites depicted and viewed black people “as being literally sub-human, mentally retarded, cowardly, incompetent, and often crazed” who can’t invent anything. Dr Mutunga deconstructed such archaic predisposition.

COLONIALISM
Sadly, some of the changes Dr. Mutunga introduced and implemented are being clear-felled pointlessly.

            During the hearing of the recent presidential petition, I bewilderingly and melancholically saw some ‘learned friends’ in wigs and robes.

Honestly, I wonder when I see a lawyer in the hot streets of Dar es Salaam or Mombasa torturing himself in suits simply because it is the “dress code”.

            This means there are some colonial carryovers that our institutions and personnel have refused to shed.

                                                                       JUSTICE
I don’t get it when I hear such people aggrandizing themselves by referring to one another as ‘learned friend’ yet they still wear wigs and use bombastic and loaded incomprehensible words instead of plain and simple language.

            Back to Dr Mutunga. He wanted Kenya’s Judiciary to look more Kenyan than British. He wanted to take the Judiciary to the people who are made to believe that it is ex-debito jusiticiae, the fountain of justice.

            But how can a wigged or masked Judiciary be while it fails to do justice by respecting the identity of those it serves—as it is the case in donning wigs and gloves for some of our public personnel?

                                                                      IMPRESSION
            In Wigs, Skeletons, Bibs, Bands, and Bundles: An Albertan Barrister Deciphers the English Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), Laura Hoyano writes that “wigs are supposed to confer dignity, but I think that they make the wearers resemble sheep, and I find it difficult to keep a sober countenance, especially when ‘full bottom’”.

            The Judiciary should rethink about abandoning the changes Dr. Mutunga chaperoned for the deconstruction and emancipation of the Kenyan Judiciary from its colonial past.

                                                       NATIONAL PRIDE

            But then, how many Kenyans understood the philosophy and wisdom of Dr. Mutunga? Latin has it that no one is considered a prophet in his homeland.

           And, I believe, Dr. Mutunga was a prophet of change.

            Importantly, he did it not for personal but national gain and pride.

Source: Daily Nation, Tues., tomorrow.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s